The Smallmouth Alliance
Conservation Issues

Starting A Regional Chapter

Smallmouth Fishing Articles

Fishing Links


No Pain, No Gain? Forced Swimming Effects on Smallmouths
By Craig Springer

This article is reprinted with permission of the Federation of Flyfishers from an article in their magazine, Flyfisher.

Maybe you heard your high school football coach say it. Anyone that’s spent some time at the health club has heard the trite saying: No pain, no gain. You got to make those muscles burn if you want to put more muscle on. They burn, then they hurt. The next morning you can’t lift your coffee cup. Keep that in the back of your mind next time you play a big fish.

Fish have muscle and experience the effects similar to ours from exercise. When and how we play fish could have long-term consequences after release. Take smallmouth bass, for example. Since male smallmouths are the primary caregivers to the young, the spawning process is protracted, maybe up to six weeks long considering nest-building, courtship, incubation, and then guarding the fry—with hardly a recess. Males on the nest will fiercely guard their space from any intruder and the vulnerability of spawning smallies to angling is well-known. In fact, to prevent over-harvest of smallmouth bass fisheries, some states and provinces have special fishing regulations, such as a closed season or catch and release during the spawning and parental care period. But even catch-and-release angling may produce undesirable outcomes to smallmouth fisheries. Assessing this question, researchers at Queen's University in Ontario, Canada, performed a study designed to gauge the physiological effects of catch-and-release angling on nesting smallmouth bass.

Nest-guarding smallmouths were caught by hook and line and played either less than 20 seconds or to complete exhaustion. Next, the scientists measured in the fish, the depletion of a chemical used for energy, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and the accumulation of lactate, the chemical responsible for sore muscles after exercise. Concentrations of ATP and lactate were compared to the length of time that fish were played. Two other parameters studied were the amount of predation on their young while absent from the nest and the time elapsed before individuals returned to nest-guarding after release.

Smallmouth bass played to exhaustion had about 50 percent of their ATP reserves depleted. The resultant lack of energy corresponded to higher levels of lactate. Smallmouth quickly landed had an 8-fold increase in lactate compared to a 13-fold increase in fish played to exhaustion.

Catching and releasing males off the nest obviously disrupts parental activities. But what impact might it have on offspring? A lack of protection from a parent leaves young fish, or eggs, vulnerable to predation. It took exhausted fish an average of eight minutes to return to nest-guarding. Those landed quickly returned in just two and a half minutes. Thirty-five percent of nests of those fish played less than 20 seconds were preyed upon while the guarding males were absent. Half the nests of the exhausted fish experienced incidents of predation. The total time predators took liberty in unguarded nests was 13 times higher in the nests where fish were played to exhaustion.

While each smallmouth bass fishery is unique in terms of populations dynamics, suffice it to say that even catch-and-release fishing at this particularly vulnerable time will have detrimental effects on smallmouth populations. Maybe we should all give a wide berth the next time we see that ring of bare cobbles in the shallows in the springtime.

TOP

BACK